“I
like what I do poorly better than what you don’t do at all.”
I don’t know who said it, or even if I got
the quote correct but that message was dancing around in my head almost the
entire time I was listening to, and disagreeing with, Andy Stanley’s latest
book Deep & Wide.
To say that Stanley’s vision of what church
is, and should be is different than mine would be an understatement. He is a
mega church pastor with mega church pedigree, running a Willow Creek style
seeker sensitive model in the southern US, and he is very good at what he does.
His presentations are slick his church is trendy, his budget is enormous and
after listening to him tell his story in great detail in the first part of this
book it seems at times that he almost falls into success. I am not that guy. I
pastor a small church in the great white north, I am not trendy, photogenic,
relevant or entirely comfortable with the attractional ministry model that
Stanley shamelessly adheres to. At least once per chapter Stanley challenges his
reader (listener in my case) to give his model a chance even though he’s well
aware that a great many of them will strenuously object to his methods and
practices and I admit that I frequently fell in to that group – yet I couldn’t
get past that quote in my mind.
Does God prefer what Andy Stanley does
poorly to what I don’t do at all?
That’s the question that this book raised
for me. I have been heavily influenced by the small organic church model in the
last number of years, a model that focus more on doing things right than doing
things effectively. It’s about preaching an ‘authentic’ Christianity, and
organising an ‘authentic’ church – one that is stridently countercultural in
many obvious ways. My model of ministry has been about ruthlessly eradicating
cultural syncretism from the church whenever I was confronted by it (and
knowing that there is far more syncretism than I will ever likely be aware of),
the biggest and most obvious source of which in my culture is consumerism. Yet
in his first or second chapter (the problem with audio books is referencing
quotes and ideas) Stanley boldly proclaims that since the culture he is in is
full of consumers that he will win them with consumerism. He maintains that
that was how Jesus preached. And he’s got chapter and verse to support his
claim.
It’s funny though – the other people
(pastors, scholars, philosophers) that I have been listening to claim the
opposite. That Jesus was ruthlessly countercultural and that the hard words of
the Gospel demonstrate a Messiah who had little tolerance for the status quo;
and they have chapter and verse to support their ideas too!
And that’s where another famous quote comes
to mind: “What you win them with, is what
you win them to.” And I don’t want to be winning people to some watered
down consumer Christianity.
But as a consequence I’m not winning very
many. I’d like to believe I’m planting a lot of seeds but if I’m honest, I’m
not pulling in much of the harvest. Perhaps that’s not my calling; I do better
with helping the garden grow (or is that God’s job? Too many metaphors get
intertwined). And so I’m left at the end
of Andy Stanley’s book with more questions than answers. I can’t write him off
as some misguided false prophet because he is passionate about the gospel, and
because his method and strategy for living it out is so well constructed and
thought out. If he is erring, he is erring with a heart chasing after Jesus and
the best of intentions. And God is blessing his ministry. And in truth there
was a lot of great stuff in the book that I did find myself agreeing with, but
it was more the peripheral issues at the core I’m still not sold.
Perhaps this is the type of stretching that
God wants to accomplish in my life. Perhaps these are the types of questions
that I need to be asking. I don’t know exactly but for now my heart is
unsettled and I’m not sure I like that feeling. That’s it. No real application.
No real axe to grind or challenge to issue, just good honest wrestling with
things. I thought I’d share my musings with you.
Until next time,
Blessings.
Interesting to read your thoughts - thanks for posting them! I actually find that I disagree more with the first statement you gave about liking what I do poorly than what someone else DOESN'T do. Some obvious examples:
ReplyDelete- I like my poorly articulated announcements better than "churchX's" lack of announcements.
- I like my poorly planned, executed and frustrating meetings better than your lack of meetings
- I like my poorly run, attended and funded ministryX over not having ministryX
Does doing something poorly over not doing it at all, really give God glory? Is doing something poorly really ever a good idea? Can we call it "organic" and get away with doing it poorly?
I found that I more easily sided with Andy's views in Deep & Wide than you seemed to, but I applaud you for not simply writing him off but asking yourself some hard questions. I'd love to keep reading your thoughts on this - and even better hearing more about it over coffee!